Hello again! It is good to feel inspired again here lately. I felt like taking a break to “decentrate” some and focus on other areas of my life.
I felt like I needed to revisit gravity again. The understanding, or lack there of, is so important in how we try to describe the inner working of our universe.
With a misunderstanding of gravity we wind up with miscalculations and misguided theories. This is just my opinion of course! 😉
By not knowing what gravity is or how it arises, we now have the dark matter dilemma. Having to create a new form of matter because of galaxy, cluster speeds, and more, should want to have the scientific community revisit some of the basic understanding in how we think thing work.
It doesn’t seem like much of that is happening. What seems to be happening, is that we are stuck on a certain way of thinking and will adjust results to match our theories. This doesn’t seem like science to me. I have heard it called confirmation bias — interpreting new evidence as validation of one’s preexisting beliefs.
OK! The topic at hand. While researching, reading, and re-visiting gravity… I found myself needing to expand out to include space in general. This includes gravity, waves (em and others), inert gases, plasma, etc.
So, this article will be about all of those and how they all fit together to help us in understanding how it all works.
To begin – as most of you know, two of my main inspirations are Walter and Lao Russell. Here are some quotes from their work on gravity, electricity, and magnetism.
To quickly revisit a few concepts –
electricity is the sole worker – responsible for compressing matter into being
it is the living, growing, first half of the cycle
centripetal, voltage, pressure, longitudinal, compressing at the poles…
magnetism is the effect of electricity – it is responsible for expanding matter back from where it came
it is the dying, decaying, second half of the cycle
centrifugal, current, transverse, expanding at the equator…
gravity – 2 different definitions, I find
a “thing” – the controlling center of the compressive force – still center / has no direction / mind force – responsible for life / desire
a “description” of a measurable action – it is the compressing centripetal direction which births matter
***this can be a confusing point***
Based on the brief descriptions above, when talking gravity the most important thing for me, will be to differentiate the above.
The controlling “thing” and the measurable action – called a force.
Gravity as a measurable action has a beginning. Gravity as “Mind”, Stillness, or the controlling “thing” is always there.
Today I will focus mainly on Gravity as a measurable action.
Newton’s gravity, they say, has been replaced by Einstein’s relativity. As seen above it still works in many cases. I am not here to argue against relativity today, but just dive into how I am coming to understand gravity.
The most interesting part about the above statement is the inverse-square law. The definition below it clearly states that its origin is from a point source. Point sources are spherical waves expanding out evenly. Keep this in mind 😉
Before I can go further into gravity, I have to touch on the background of space, ether theory, plasma, what thought waves are, more.
This should probably be multiple articles but I wanted to bring it all together as one.
Let’s start with the background of space. Sometimes referred to as Aether/Ether, the vacuum, and more, depending on who you read.
Throughout history, explaining the background of space has been important. To understand how matter and energy interact, and how light can travel. From Tesla, to Lorentz, to Lord Kelvin. Many brilliant minds have visited this topic.
I will first say that I don’t agree with every ether theory, as there are many. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories
It is descriptive word that has many meanings and connotations. So, I won’t use it here, as it may scare some away.
But what I do find is that certain descriptions of the ether of the past, do fit.
The Russells speak often about the importance of the inert or noble gases. How they are the seeds of the elements and without them we would not have matter. That our chemical elements spring from them and decay back to them. They say they are “not divided” and “motionless”. They have refereed to them as the “Akashic Records”.
These are interesting descriptions and here are 2 examples why. Nikola Tesla (father of electricity) and Dmitri Mendeleev (father of our chemical element chart).
For Tesla –
This is very exciting to read… It is a gaseous medium. It is neutral or inert. He calls it the Akasha. He calls it electrostatic, which to me, references longitudinal waves. He references the “whirls” or vortices, which we won’t cover here.
For Mendeleev –
OK, so he also believed that the background of space could exist as an ether, and that this ether, was made of inert gases. He even left spots on his charts for an ether element, along with spots below hydrogen for more inert gases.
I do believe there are levels below hydrogen, called octaves, that elements and inert gases belong to.
On a side note… The famous Michaelson and Morley experiment which “proved” the ether to not exist, may have not actually proved that.
The theory at the time, that they were trying actually prove, was that with a stationary ether and the earth moving through it – there would be ether wind. But when they measured the light at a few different angles, there was no shift. With no shift of light and no ether wind – they thought it doesn’t exist.
I think that if there were an ether type background to space, AND it is made of inert gases, with those inert gases in very cold conditions, this substance would not offer up any friction = zero viscosity. SO! There still could be an ether of a material that has very low friction and can permeate through and between all matter but not cause any ether wind. 😀
Now back to it. We have a background to space which is not quite a vacuum but is really close to being still (there still could be a vacuum in places?). It is made of inert gases that don’t interact with other elements and are the “seeds” of these elements. (interesting how elements DO decay back to their inert gases – this has been verified)
With a still background, like a calm ocean, we need something to set it in motion. Here is where “thought waves” or “thinking” come into play.
Thinking and thought waves can be different, just like our gravity defs above.
Thinking is electric and is an action – to set something in motion. It compresses. It expands out from a point, with the intensity based on desire.
Thought Waves are a “thing” – this is a cycle or a wave which divides or disturbs this still ether inert gas medium.
To me, I put this together to mean…
Thinking is the sole worker in this universe. So is electricity. So thinking is electric.
Thinking expands out spherically from a point and interferes with other thought waves.
These waves that expand out are longitudinal, like sound waves. They interfere with other longitudinal waves to create lenses
Which in turn creates compression (vortices).
Voltage is compression. Electrostatic force is compression.
These waves are moving through the inert gas medium, compressing and expanding, as they go.
Now lets bring gravity back in. If Gravity as a “measurable action”, is the direction of compression, then gravity relates to the interaction of the waves in the medium and the matter it creates.
Pressure or compression induced on to the background of space, or inert gas medium, would then in turn create the elements.
Interference is important in regards to this compression. When spherical waves expand out, there is only progression when other spherical waves interfere. This interference create convex lenses which focus these waves down. (even though these initial waves are longitudinal – they can still interfere and create lenses. See how sound waves are effected traveling through gas)
Now can we say, gravity as an action, is the compressing living growth end of the cycle. Gravity as a concept or a “thing” is the centering point. The direction and destination point where compression is maximum. So gravity increases towards it “center of gravity”.
It is said, that gravity SHOULD travel faster than the speed of light. I do agree with this because look how long it takes for sunlight to reach the earth. 8 minutes I think. But imagine how our planet’s orbit around the sun would be affected if gravity was this slow. How could we have any form of consistency and how do the planets stay on this path?
These expanding waves which, in turn, create gravity, have to be faster than SOL.
Also, “light” along with other EM radiation, is part of the transverse equatorial waves that are in the second half of the cycle.
Light is said to be made of photons. Photons are said to be measurements or pieces of waves. These waves are transverse.
photons make up the magnetic field
when gases have high voltage (pressure/compression) they emit light – or photons or transverse waves. ding ding!
Just as the Russells describe the wave cycle. Compression and expansion. This allows us to understand electricity and magnetism, the electron and photon, living and dying.
To add some nice confirmation to all of this – PLASMA.
Neutral gases? Like inert?
Electrostatic-Longitudinal waves in plasma?
Neon sign anyone?? These signs have glowing plasma in them.
a neon sign is an inert gas with high voltage applied – so using voltage or compression or higher pressure or longitudinal wave
we get a photon or transverse discharge in the visible light spectrum – each gas has a color
why can’t we use this analogy on inert gases in space – being compressed and giving off a transverse EM wave – whether visible light or other em waves
Think about it – if inert gases are the background medium, and when electricity (thinking) is applied to them, a plasma forms?
this would match up with space being filled by plasma
so this inert medium called aether, ether, whatever… is inert until we apply this electricity and it becomes a plasma
this would need to be a cold plasma at first, then it can be made into matter
Sir William Crookes in 1879 called it “radiant matter”
It is all related and it all makes sense!!!!!!!!
We need to continue down this path to help match these concepts up scientifically. Is the electron the longitudinal action that releases the photon just as described above?
Back in the day they said the electron was just a disturbance in the ether – moving through it. Not a particle but just a measurable disturbance – longitudinal wave?
We definitely need to dig into that.
There is much more to this that I will continue to work on. But I wanted to get this out to all you, amazing minds!
As always… much love!
EDIT: to add – also lookup sonoluminescence. This is where using sound waves in a standing wave, creates a burst of light. They also add inert gas inside to help increase the light emission and claim to create plasma inside. Sound familiar? 😀